Himalayan Tourism in Nepal Essay Example for Free

Himalayan Tourism in Nepal Essay

The Psychological Journey of the Narrator in Atwood’s Surfacing Essay

The Psychological Journey of the Narrator in Atwood’s Surfacing  Ã‚     Ã‚  Ã‚   In Surfacing, a novel by Margaret Atwood, the narrator undertakes three basic journeys: a physical quest to search for her lost father, a biographical journey into her past, and most importantly a psychological journey. The psychological journey allows the narrator to reconcile her past and ultimately leads to the conclusion of the physical journey. In this psychological voyage into her innerself, the narrator, while travelling from cognizant rational reasoning to subconscious dissociated reality progresses through three stages. In the first stage, the narrator is in touch with reality; she lives and exists in a state of mind known in Freudian psychology as the Ego. The Ego is defined as "the element of being that consciously and continuously enables an individual to think, feel and act." (Barnhardt, 667). The ego is based on a reality principle, in which, a person reacts in "realistic ways that will bring long term pleasure rather than pain or destruction" (Meyers, 414). The narrator's inability to cope with disagreeable thoughts such as her father's possible death is evidenced early in the novel. The narrator states: "nothing is the same, I don't know the way anymore. I slide my tongue around the ice cream, trying to concentrate on it, they put seaweed in it now, but I'm starting to shake, why is the road different, he shouldn't have allowed them to do it, I want to turn around and go back to the city and never find out what happened to him. I'll start crying, that would be horrible, none of them would kno w what to do and neither would I. I bite down into the cone and I can't feel anything for a minute but the knife-hard pain up the side of my face... ...to reality: "The lake is quiet, the trees surround me, asking and giving nothing" (Atwood, 224). Thus, the narrator has completed a psychological journey from snaeness to madness and then again in a fullcircle, travelling through three distinct stages: the Ego, the Superego, and the Id. The narrator by completing the psychological journey into the subconscious is able to resolve the biographical and physical journeys. Therefore, with the past and present conflicts resolved, it can be most likely assumed that the narrator will assimilate herself back into reality. She may have a chance to become human again. Works Cited Atwood, Margaret. Surfacing. Simon and Schuster: New york, 1972 Barnhardt, Clarence L. Ed. The World Book Dictionary, Field Enterprises Publishing Co: Chicago, 1975. Meyers, David. Psychology. Worth Publishing:U.S.A., 1992   

Automobile and Toyota Company Essay

1. Toyota has built a huge manufacturing company that can produce millions of cars each year for a wide variety of consumers. Why was it able to grow so much bigger than any other auto manufacturer? The Toyota Company grow so much bigger than any other auto manufacture because of the act according to preference of the customer Market segment. Toyota Company produce large range of subcompacts to luxury and sports vehicles to SUVs, trucks, minivans, and buses. They segment their product according to need of customer. They create their market segment. They produce Scion car that is target the teenage and it becomes famous among the teenage. 2. Has Toyota done the right thing by manufacturing a car brand for everyone? Why or why not? I think Toyota Company done the right thing by manufacturing a car brand for everyone. They manufacture a really great range of exciting new cars which will open people’s eyes and minds. They analyze what a customer need and develop the same feature automobile in the comparable price. They divide their market segment. In the market there are different people with different perception. Toyota prove they produce wide variety of the auto that will use by different types of customer. They try to develop the auto according to the customer perception. They want to satisfy each customer. The price range of the Toyota Company is lies very expensive to inexpensive. Toyota automobile are in the reach of middle class to high class such that the user of the Toyota automobile are very much higher than other automobile company. Toyota understands that each country defines perfection differently. 3. Did Toyota grow too quickly as Toyota suggested? What should the company do over thenext year, 5 years, or 10 years? How can growing companies avoid quality problems in the future? Toyota Company grows too quickly as their suggested. Toyota is integrating its assembly plants around the world into a single giant network. They do customize on the car according to the need of the customer. Toyota’s need to keep their product’s selection and quality superior to their competition. Toyota company are become one of the successful manufacturing company due to  their consistent quality. They have to maintain their performance quality. Whether they customized the car or develop new model according to customer need they need to maintain same core quality all around the world. They need to maintain reliability on automobile. The same superior quality and dependable should be maintaining. The design of the automobile should be unique and while developing new model design car they need to maintain core material as same. They need to customize regular according to the customer. They need to maintain extraordinary look for each model. Such that it will look very distinctive than competitor. They need to produce high quality and high specific design automobile. They need to give services after the purchasing the product and more ever they have to delivery every item in the time. They need to create more value of automobile by giving some of the discount or either by various services. They need to provide e-support for their customer and they need to update their information through the media. As we know people perfection are different according to the geographic area. A great product by itself is not enough so the Toyota need to advertise themselves according to customer perfection at that place. They need to make market strategy differently in different country. The Toyota Company is giving Guaranteed Auto Protection to their customer. They need to keep it up.

Bill of Rights - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1450 Downloads: 2 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Law Essay Type Analytical essay Tags: Human Rights Essay Did you like this example? à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“If a home grown Bill of Rights was adopted, fundamental rights and freedoms would be afforded better protection.à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  Even prior to re-entering office in 1997 and overseeing the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998, the Labour Party was constitutionally committed to the enactment of a Bill of Rights[1]: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“The incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights is a necessary first step, but it is not a substitute for our own Bill of Rightsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ . In the period that has elapsed since the 1998 Act, the political imperative to achieve a à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“home grownà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  Bill of Rights appears to have dwindled[2]. Lord Scarman in the Preface to Zanderà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s A Bill of Rights[3] points out: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Laws for the protection of the rights of individuals are of little value to the citizen if he cannot enforce them directly in the courts of his own country.à ¢Ã¢â€ š ¬Ã‚  Of course, since that was written, the argument that the enforcement of human rights in the UK required a trip to Strasbourg has largely disappeared but there remain fundamental concerns that the incorporation of the ECHR will prove a palliative rather than a panacea and will distract attention from the need for domestic measures to enshrine fundamental rights. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Bill of Rights" essay for you Create order It is submitted that a Bill of Rights is required for two reasons: first, it is necessary clearly to define the types of rights and freedoms which should be accorded special protection; second, having done so, it is necessary to embody them in a document which has particular legal status and priority. Oliver and Drewry[4] take the view that the 1998 Act achieves neither of these objectives; while à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“an important step in that directionà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ , it fulfils neither of these objectives fully. What is required is a Bill of Rights with full constitutional authority. A major obstacle facing the implementation of a UK Bill of Rights is complacency. For centuries, our citizens have taken a pride in a system of democratic government which has been exported all over the world without the need for a written constitution. This type of à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“if it ainà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢t broke, donà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢t fix ità ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  mentality ignores the considerable further a dvantages which such an instrument might confer. While it is argued that the adoption of such a bill would interfere with the doctrine of separation of powers in that the interpretation of it would confer upon the judiciary a function akin to legislation, it can hardly be suggested that the present situation in which legislative and executive power are controlled by the process of judicial review (which has evolved at common law and has no legislative foundation) is more satisfactory. As has already been seen with the introduction of direct enforceability of the ECHR, the existence of a Bill of Rights would raise public awareness of rights issues. In common with the American Constitution, it could be taught in schools and engender a sense of civic rights and responsibilities which is presently lacking. Citizens would thus become empowered by readily accessible and understandable methods of enforcing their rights against those who might improperly use power over them. Most importa ntly, the Bill would act as a benchmark against which the actions of government could be challenged. The idea that current legislation reflects the will of the people is a fallacy. It is frequently the case that the political party holding a majority in Parliament has been elected by a minority of the population (and, as a result of the à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“first past the postà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  system) even a minority of the overall votes cast. By convention, that party will nonetheless form the government of the day. Thereafter, the system of Cabinet government (dominated in any event by Prime Ministers who are less à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“first among equalsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  and increasingly presidential) and party whipping results in the passage of legislation such as that in respect of terrorism for which the popular mandate is questionable to say the least. A further significant advantage would lie in the unifying and codifying effect which such a Bill would have upon the present hotch-potch o f equality and discrimination legislation. At present, prohibition of discrimination is to be found in a variety of measures which have been introduced over time such as the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 and the Race Relations Act 1976. More recently the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003[5] and the Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003[6] have been introduced to combat discrimination on the grounds of religious belief and sexual orientation. A consideration of these two Statutory Instruments reveals the absurdity that each is couched in virtually identical terms to the other but nonetheless has had to be separately enacted. A Bill of Rights could provide for the essential elements of equality from which the rights of all minorities that are discriminated against could then derive. This would ensure that unlike at present legislation and case law to combat discrimination on such grounds as disability and age would keep pace with the more tr aditionally accepted evils of racial and sexual discrimination. Foremost among the voices that continues to call for a UK Bill of Rights is Liberty which has published a draft bill[7] which, while acknowledging the ECHR also draws upon the 1966 United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Liberty argues that a Bill of Rights should be enforceable by individuals against all agents of the state and this would therefore include the judiciary as well as national and local government. The present problem with the Human Rights Act 1998 is that it is possible for the government to circumvent its intended effect by passing legislation which is in conflict with the ECHR. A Bill of Rights, by contrast, would enjoy overriding status. As in the case of the USA Constitution, measures which violated the provisions of the Bill would be struck down as inferior legislation. This would obviate the present tension between enforcement of rights under the 1998 Act and the reme dies previously available by way of judicial review. Finally, the frequently expressed concerns that parliamentary sovereignty would be undermined by the existence of such a Bill can be demonstrated to be misplaced. Unlike the 1998 Act which derives from an external European Convention, the Bill of Rights would be the creation of Parliament itself. Its imposition and subsequent adherence to it would serve to enhance rather than diminish the authority of Parliament. In conclusion, therefore, the passage of the Human Rights Act 1998 may be described (however anomalous this may appear at first sight) as a retrograde step for the cause of the enactment of a Bill f Rights in this jurisdiction. While the implementation of the European Convention should be lauded for the focus that it has attracted to the subject of individual rights in relation to the potential misuse of power by the state, the temptation is now for those significant players in the political game who previously espouse d such constitutional reform to regard the issue as largely redundant. It has been demonstrated that this is not so and that the need for a comprehensive code remains as acute as ever not only further to enhance the protection of human rights introduced by the impact of European measures but also to provide a unifying and consolidating force in a jurisdiction which has relied for far too long upon the development of common law principles and remedies to safeguard the liberty and other freedoms of the individual. A Royal Commission should be tasked with taking forward to work commenced by groups such as Liberty in order to implement the unification of a wide range of rights under a single, comprehensible and accessible code of rights. Bibliography Alder, J., General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law, (4th Ed., 2002) Allen, M. Thompson, B., Cases and Materials on Constitutional and Administrative Law, (7th Ed., 2003) Barnett, H., Constitutional and Admin istrative Law, (5th Ed., 2004) Bradley, A. Ewing, K., Constitutional and Administrative Law, (13th Ed., 2003) Fenwick, H. Phillipson, G., Text, Cases and Materials on Public Law and Human Rights, (2nd Ed., 2003) Labour Party, A New Agenda for Democracy: Labourà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s Proposals for Constitutional Reform, (1993) Liberty, A Peopleà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s Charter, Libertyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s Bill of Rights, (1991) Liberty, Liberty Bill of Rights, (1995) Oliver, D. Drewry, G., The Law and Parliament, (1998) Wadham, J., A British Bill of Rights in Blackburn, R. Plant, R., (Eds.), Constitutional Reform: The Labour Governmentà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s Constitutional Reform Agenda, (1999) Zander, M., A Bill of Rights?, (4th Ed., 1997) Footnotes [1] Labour Party, A New Agenda for Democracy: Labourà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s Proposals for Constitutional Reform, (1993), pp.29-32 [2] See, Wadham, J., A British Bill of Rights in Blackburn, R. Plant, R., (Eds.), Constitutional Reform: The Labour Governmentà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s Constitutional Reform Agenda, (1999) [3] (4th Ed., 1997) [4] Oliver, D. Drewry, G., The Law and Parliament, (1998), p.177 [5] 2003 SI No.1660 [6] 2003 SI No.1661 [7] Liberty, Liberty Bill of Rights, (1995)